American Progressives United

Progressive News & Notes

Following news about Progressive Parties in various parts of the country is an archive of statements and press releases issued to date by American Progressives United Party.




American Progressives United Party Supports
Occupy Wall Street and Actions around the Nation

American Progressives United Party and its affiliated Progressive Parties support Occupy Wall Street and similar actions around the country targeting big banks, multinational corporations and the corrupt politicians and parties that they control.

We stand with our fellow citizens in New York, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle and other places who are committed to social and economic justice, creating jobs for all, ending unnecessary wars and closing the growing gap between the rich and the rest of us.

Bernadette Buddington,
Colorado Coordinator
American Progressives United Party
Linde Knighton,
Chair
Progressive Party of Washington
Morgan Daybell,
Executive Director
Vermont Progressive Party
Dr. Marcosa J. Santiago,
Advisory Board
American Progressives United Party
Dave Ecklein,
Chair
New Hampshire Progressive
Organizing Project
Glen Sharp,
California Coordinator
American Progressives United Party
Pam Ellison,
Former Chair
Minnesota Open Progressives
George H. Strauss,
Chair
American Progressives United Party

Occupy Wall Street, Liberty Plaza, Manhattan — October 3, 2011




The following article was published
August 2, 2011 on www.CounterPunch.org

Democrats and Their Excuses
Beyond the Debt and Deficit Fixation
By George H. Strauss

Stepping aside from the sudden Washington obsession with debt and deficits, we should remind ourselves as to who has been in charge of the federal government, at least pro forma, since 2008 and what real outcomes have been achieved.

The Democratic Party and President Obama always seem to have excuses for their performance, whether they control both houses of congress and the presidency, as during 2009-2010, or whether they control the presidency and Senate but not the House as they do currently.

They continually find some reason why they can't implement a New Deal jobs program, pass single-payer Medicare for All, end the countless invasions and occupations of other countries, end Bush tax cuts for the rich, or prevent lobbyists from gutting regulations that are intended to implement supposed reforms.

Blue Dog Democrats in the House, 60 votes allegedly required in the Senate, Tea Party Republicans, you name it, the list of excuses is long and contemptible.

People forget that President George W. Bush used the reconciliation process in the Senate many times to ram through legislation he wanted. It was most notably employed in 2003 to pass huge tax cuts on capital gains and dividends benefiting the rich. The vote was 51-50, and the 51st vote was provided by Vice President Dick Cheney in his role as president of the Senate.

No need for 60 votes when you really want to get something budget-related passed in the Senate like, God forbid, rolling back the Bush tax cuts for the rich. But, you first need to have the political will to do such things, which has been lacking under the Democrats, who do not like to anger their wealthy paymasters. Treading on unions and progressives is OK, however, with Obama and the Democratic leadership.

Next year, we will be once again be subjected to the harum-scarum of a potential GOP victory and the need to once again vote for the "lesser evil," i.e., the Democrats. Problem is, when you look at what the Democrats actually do as opposed to their fine speeches, the evil does not look much lesser. Think endless outsourcing of jobs to China and other low-wage countries, foreign bombings and occupations as far as the eye can see, continuation of tax breaks for the wealthy, escalation of the Big Brother State at home and abroad, obsession with deficits instead of job creation.

Following are some examples from recent news reports of what happens when Democrats are in office these days:

"Companies churn out profits but jobs don't follow"
"The sluggish pace of hiring may be hobbling the economy, but it's not been holding back big U.S. companies' profits thanks to growth overseas and cost controls at home. And that's bad news for the more than 14 million Americans without jobs." (Reuters, July 24, 2011)

"GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt, The Head Of Obama's Jobs Council, Is Moving Jobs And Economic Infrastructure To China At A Blistering Pace"
How the head of tax-evading, jobs outsourcing GE fronts for Obama on jobs. (Hawaii News Daily, June 28, 2011)

"Layoffs Deepen Gloom"
Companies are laying off employees at a level not seen in a year. (The Wall Street Journal, July 21, 2011)

"Wealth Gap Gets Even Wider - Crash in housing prices takes toll on blacks and Hispanics, while stocks help whites"
(USA Today, July 27, 2011)

"Summer Cuts Launch Lunch Scramble"
Federal, state and local budget cuts eliminate summer school for tens of thousands of children and the free lunch that comes with it, hitting poor families hard. (The Wall Street Journal, July 25, 2011)

"New Stable of Wealthy Donors Fueled Obama Campaign's Record Fund-Raising Quarter"
Less than two percent of the total came from checks of less than $200.00. (The New York Times, July 17, 2011)

Time for real progressives to look beyond the two major parties and get busy!


George H. Strauss is active in the Progressive Party movement in New York and nationally. He can be reached via www.americanprogressivesunitedparty.org ("Contact Us").




National Nurses United Rally on Wall Street

      

National Nurses United, an outgrowth of California Nurses Association, has a broad vision of what needs to be done to improve the lives of all struggling Americans as well as to work for better conditions for its members.

On June 22, the group held a rousing rally in New York with the theme, "Make Wall Street Pay for the Damage Done to Main Street," in front of Federal Hall on Wall Street. George and Annie Strauss along with other members of American Progressives United Party participated in the event.

Speakers at the rally called for a half-cent tax on stock and bond sales and other financial transactions. The new revenue would restore jobs and help fix the economy.

The protest was part of the union's national campaign, The Main Street Contract with the American People, which calls for job creation and more just education, healthcare, retirement, housing and taxation systems. The Main Street Contract slogan is "RNs Chart a Better Life for All Americans."

For more information about National Nurses United and its affiliated state chapters, go to: www.nationalnursesunited.org




Linde Knighton, chair of the Progressive Party of Washington, reports the following recent actions by the Party:

  • Currently preparing for city council endorsements. The Party may give a negative endorsement to the worst candidate, who is running unopposed.
     
  • Working with a third-party coalition to stop Secretary of State Sam Reed from having the sole power to decide which parties can give money to their own candidates. Also killed a bill to force all taxpayers to pay for Democratic and GOP precinct officer elections.
     
  • Working with Sisters Organize for Survival on Wall of Shame for legislators who voted for the all-cuts state budget, which was researched by Linde Knighton.
     
  • Participated in April Days of Action in Olympia, WA, which focused on a variety of issues.
     
  • Working more closely with other third parties on common issues.
     
  • Suggested that National League of Women Voters work on ballot access laws in addition to voter rights.
     
  • Party member Rob Tice started refrigerator recycling in Vancouver, WA.
     
  • Member Judi Gibbs got a resolution passed in the Democratic 36th District to require Seattle Police to wear body cameras.
     

      




Current News about Vermont Progressive Party:




American Progressives United Party activists George and Annie Strauss participated in a New York City protest march as part of National Day of Action Against Wage Theft on November 18. The local action was organized by the Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York and took the form of orderly demonstrations in front of restaurants owned by celebrity chef Mario Batali. He is facing a lawsuit filed by 27 workers who say they have not been paid a legal wage and the tips due them.




Archive of Statements and Press Releases




Remembering Martin Luther King: April 4, 1968 AND April 4, 1967

New York, NY - April 4, 2011

April 4, 1968 - the date of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination - was a tragic day in American history. Exactly a year earlier, on April 4, 1967, Dr. King gave one of the greatest speeches in American history.

The title was "Beyond Vietnam," delivered before 3,000 people at Riverside Church in New York City. It was a riveting speech whose reverberations should still stir us today. For both the audio and text of King's speech, click on:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2564.htm

On this day, please join us in remembering the great loss our country suffered on April 4, 1968, and let us rededicate ourselves to the values and principles he so eloquently stated a year before his death.

American Progressives United Party was formed in January 2010 as a national framework to support and expand Progressive Parties across the U.S. Our inspiration comes from the Progressive reform tradition extending back to the 1870's and from the life and work of leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr.

We appreciate your forwarding this email to anyone who might like to hear Dr. King's 1967 speech for the first time or revisit it now.

In Solidarity,

George Strauss
Chair
American Progressives United Party
www.americanprogressivesunitedparty.org

Return to Archive Index




American Progressives United Party
Supports Unions, Worker Gains

New York, NY - March 3, 2011

On behalf of American Progressives United Party, we stand with our Progressive brothers and sisters fighting to maintain unions in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states where they are under attack.

We share with them a commitment to the values and accomplishments of the Progressive reform tradition: right of unions to organize, the eight-hour day, minimum wage and pensions, women's right to vote, civil rights for minorities, anti-trust enforcement, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

These and other gains for both unionized and non-unionized workers have been achieved through strenuous efforts by unions and their supporters in our society. They have not come easily, but they have made life better for all Americans.

This Progressive tradition must be maintained. The forces seeking to crush unions and Progressive reforms must be defeated by concerted action.

In Solidarity,

Bernadette Buddington, Regional Coordinator
American Progressives United Party

Morgan Daybell, Executive Director
Vermont Progressive Party

Dave Ecklein, Chair
New Hampshire Progressive
Organizing Project

Pam Ellison, Chair
Minnesota Open Progressives

Linde Knighton, Chair
Progressive Party of Washington

Dr. Marcosa J. Santiago, Advisory Board
American Progressives United Party

George Strauss, Chair
American Progressives United Party

Contact us at:
www.americanprogressivesunitedparty.org

Return to Archive Index




Testimony before the 2010 New York City
Charter Revision Commission, July 26, 2010
Regarding Nonpartisan, Top Two Elections

By George H. Strauss
American Progressives United Party

The nonpartisan election zombie lives on in New York City.

The 2003 New York City Charter Revision Commission proposed a top two electoral system to replace party primaries before the general election in November. There would be a nonpartisan open primary election, and the top two vote-getters in the primary would compete in the November general election, regardless of their party affiliations, if any.

It was not sufficient that 70 percent of the voters in New York City voted against the top two proposal in 2003. Various interests behind it are once again attempting to bamboozle the public about the mystical virtues of nonpartisan elections and persuade them to pass a ballot resolution instituting a top two system in this November's election.

While supportive of the top two proposal, the 2003 Charter Revision Final Report was candid enough to state that academic studies on nonpartisan elections up to then were far from conclusive. Since 2003, there has been new research, and the current Charter Revision Commission reports that academic studies on the effect of top two continue to be inconclusive at best.

The Preliminary Staff Report of the 2010 Commission touts the flip-flop by "good government" groups such as Citizens Union of New York on the top two issue. In 2003, Citizens Union was against it, now they are for it. It has been said by some interested persons that the Citizens Union flip-flop is a "game-changer." If passed, a top two system would certainly change the game of politics in New York, but not in the people's interest.

According to the 2010 Charter Revision Staff Report, "Citizens Union points to the further sharp decline in voter turnout in the 2005 and 2009 elections and the increasing number of voters who register as independents as reasons for supporting this (top two) system." What Citizens Union fails to address, however, are the real reasons fewer New Yorkers are voting and more are registering as independents. One major reason is the uninspiring candidates and bogus campaign promises that the major parties have been offering at election time and then forgetting about once elected to office.

The 2010 Staff Report cites political scientist Richard Clucas, who has found that both nonpartisan elections and top two elections in which party identification is permitted do not yield the promised results. According to Professor Clucas, nonpartisan elections do not significantly increase overall turnout. Although they do increase turnout among independents, they also depress turnout among the poor and less educated.

Many top two proponents consider "Independents" to be the gold standard for voters. In reality, they are a very small part of the electorate and often a fairly elite segment of it. According to Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, "There are an awful lot of people who call themselves independent because it's fashionable in some circles. But their voting behavior is predictable. They are not swing voters."

There is also substantial evidence that low and declining voter turnout is in part a result of the weakening of political parties. This trend has been underway for many years, and the drying up of grass roots party activity in New York reflects two factors.

First, people are disenchanted with what political parties promise compared with what they actually deliver. Second, the cost of campaigning has increased exponentially, and only candidates with big bucks are taken seriously by the media and can afford to wage expensive TV campaigns. This hunger for money will not change under a top two system, and there is every reason to believe it will get worse as "independent" candidates increasingly appeal to voters through costly television advertising.

As a former Democratic activist and Manhattan County Committeeman years ago who has joined the Progressive Party movement, I can personally attest to the decay of Democratic Party organization in New York and voter disenchantment with what the party today promises and actually delivers.

The fact that California just recently adopted by referendum a top two system does not necessarily recommend it as electoral progress. The State of California has a history of adopting all kinds of bad ideas, and this one was based on a turnout of just 33 percent of registered voters - hardly an indication of massive voter interest in the virtues of top two primaries.

More to the point is what a colleague of mine in Washington State reports on the impact of top two voting there in recent years. Linde Knighton, chair of the Washington State Progressive Party, observes that the top two system there has favored the wealthiest candidates, those with well-known names and incumbents generally. In some top two general elections, voters are faced with two candidates from the same party! This is not a choice between Tweedledee and Tweedledum. This is a choice between Tweedledee 1.0 and Tweedledee 2.0.

The other secret that proponents of top two don't want broadcast is that it is clearly designed to kill off pesky third parties, which at times threaten the hegemony of the Democrats and Republicans. There is a grand tradition in New York City politics of third party agitation for reform, justice and a better world here. If third parties fail to make the top two and are thus prevented from being on the ballot in November, more than a little democracy and voter choice will have been killed in the process.

The answer to uninspiring major party politics in New York is not to cut off access to the ballot in November for third parties, but rather to make it easier for them to challenge the two major parties and give the voters a real choice, not an echo in the general election.

Let us put aside the tinker toy theory of government and focus on making it feasible for candidates who are not rich or who are not backed by big monied interests to gain ballot access and campaign on a more level playing field. This, I guarantee you, will increase voter turnout and enthusiasm for elections. The electoral process in New York will then be viewed as a means for the expression of the people's interest and not a periodic slight of hand that provides crumbs from the table for the so-called "little people."

I thank the Charter Revision Commission for the opportunity to testify today.


George H. Strauss is founder and chair of American Progressives United Party, an umbrella organization for existing and emerging Progressive Parties throughout the United States. For information about them, please go to the APUP Web site: www.americanprogressivesunitedparty.org. You can email George Strauss through the Contact Us form on the Web site.

Return to Archive Index




Progressive Party Movement Opposes
Proposition 14 in California Vote

New York, NY - June 6, 2010

American Progressives United Party and the Progressive Parties in Vermont, Minnesota and Washington State urge California voters to vote no on Proposition 14 on June 8.

Proposition 14, the top-two election system, is being pushed in California as a way to let anyone run in the primary election. While it does make access to the primary ballot easier for third parties, it effectively blocks their access to the general election by limiting ballot choices to only the top two vote getters in the primary.

The result of the top-two election system is the systematic elimination of any choice for voters other than Republican or Democrat in the general election, unless a third party can overcome one of the two "major parties" in the primary.

We therefore urge California voters to vote NO on Proposition 14 if they wish to retain their constitutionally guaranteed right to vote for the candidate of their choice in each and every election.

American Progressives United Party
George H. Strauss, Chair

Minnesota Open Progressives
Pam Ellison, Chair

Vermont Progressive Party
Morgan Daybell, Executive Director

Progressive Party of Washington
Linde Knighton, Chair

Return to Archive Index




Back to top


 

 

 
Copyright © 2010 American Progressives United Party. All rights reserved.

Home Page Where We Stand Who We Are Resources Contact Us Articles & News About Cooperatives Progressive News & Notes Progressive News & Notes